Police Constables Oath

Totally agree luke , but neither do the courts either , i got evidence of police cps magistrates court crown court all conspiring to defraud me , they allowed evidence to be tampered with , paid a guy to lie saying if you compress a 17 second clip it will shorten it to 6 seconds, this perjury was allowed, evidence was also sold by swp before a trial had started magistrate said it font matter , but it was evidence and must be protected not sold for police funds before a trial had even started , crown allowed perverting the course of justice , perjury , misconduct in public office , fraud , deception, contempt of court as constables bodycam proved it but was cut out to prevent a innocence , they refused to give me the evidence took 12 months sfter i was found guilty for them to finally give it over , they said sue us basically, i have been assaulted there aiding in the removal of my human rights and even threatening me , i got loads of evidence its corruption from bottom to the top and they will refuse you legal aid refuseyou a trial by jury so they can commit there criminal corruption fir financial gains , i even got evidence of them forcing there way into my house without a warrant and then saying thry didnt enter cctv showed they did , complaint was rejected and said they didnt enter , was attacked and assaulted by armed police whilst in my own garden trting to get in my house , he stole my phone tried to delete the footage then attacked me when i tried to get it back saying dint go for a tazer , taser was on his left I grabbed his right arm which had my phone , complaint same thing he said they said i went for his taser , took 9 months for them to release bodycam footage which shower his attack and lies and there cover up of it , swp are the real criminals people need to worry about , they also stole £300 in this same incident bidy cam you can hear the one Constable say have you counted it and she replied no my hands are full , on my release they gave my £3 back for bus home which cost £5 and as im also disabled they thought it was funny i didnt have enough to get home and they left my phone on for 18 hours do was flat and had no way home , it was all funny to them .
In court the whole thing was dismissed as having no evidence but still they kept my property they stole when unlawfully arrested.

Mike 💯 i now declared myself a living man under common law jurisdiction only , legal / legalese /maritime laws have no jurisdiction over the living man .
Only good thing to come of all this was I educated myself and learnt the difference between the two .

They dont really uphold the law in south wales. Specifically Sect 4 Fraud act 2006. They don’t even understand it. PSD, IOPC and OPCC are all pretty much useless too. I’ve got excuses in writing that are contradictory and clearly show a complete lack of understanding.

We should speak. +447845933262

The heading entitled “Police Constables Oath” is a misnomer. It is not an oath as it contains no religious element, ie, God. It’s an affirmation or attestation, as it is usually referred to yet the office of constable demands that an oath be sworn. Also, the “police” are a creation of statute, not Common Law an opposing jurisdiction.
In order to become a corporate police officer you first have to submit to the requirements of the office of constable by swearing an oath to God that you will “well and truly serve to our Sovereign Lady the Queen, in the office of constable….,” where your duty is to uphold the rule of law, the Common Law, the Supreme Law of the Land.
The dilemma mentioned earlier is attributed to the fact that the religious element of the constables oath of office was bypassed by the simple expedient of replacing it with an attestation going back to the Police Act 1964. Therefore there have been no true constables for over 50 years! Even after the passing of the Promissory Oaths Act 1868, Constables were still required to take the oath of office.
This is the result, not even an option to swear a solemn oath to God.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zzcxz3efxtp39wp/police%20attestation%20slide.pdf?dl=0
If you attest, you are not swearing an oath; therefore you cannot be sworn in, a contradiction in terms. It says “Before being sworn in as a Constable, and receiving their police powers…” so, police officers powers come from where again?
They can call themselves constables, police constables or police officers but at no time are they actually operating in that specific Common Law jurisdiction from which their powers are obtained, that of the office of constable. In addition, a man cannot serve two masters (1) in two opposing and contradictory jurisdictions and should that dilemma ever arise, to whom does his primary allegiance lie?
(1) https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Matthew-6-24/ “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”

Historically, I believe that the correct wording for the constable’s oath was as follows: “I swear, that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady the Queen, in the Office of Constable for the (here mention the constablewick), for the year next ensuing, or until I shall be thereof discharged by due course of law. I shall see the Queens peace kept, and keep all such watch and ward as are usually accustomed and ought to be kept; and I shall well and truly do and execute all other things belonging to the said office, according to the best of my skill and knowledge.” So help me God.
Also, who is the Queen as referred to in the new attestation? Why is Her Majesty no longer our Sovereign Lady? By removing the words “Our Sovereign Lady” the authors of that “oath” have compiled a document which imagines the death of the Sovereign, which is punishable under the Treason Act 1351. It has also removed the Style and Honour of Her Majesty as a Sovereign Queen by Law established, which is an offence contrary to the 1848 Treason Felony Act.