About us

✍️ Founder’s Note

From Andrew — Investigator, Architect of Accountability

I didn’t set out to build a website. I set out to find answers.

Answers about safeguarding failures, procedural gaps, asset transfers that didn’t add up, and organisations whose transparency faded the moment scrutiny approached.

What I discovered was more than patterns — it was the need for structure. Not just facts, but frameworks. Not just protest, but process.

This Civic Intelligence Centre isn’t about me. It’s about the belief that every citizen deserves access to clear, evidence-backed tools to trace what’s hidden, challenge what’s systemic, and hold power to account.

I work independently, but never in isolation. My methods are precise, my standards high, and my motivation simple: Truth should be traceable. Justice should be teachable. Oversight should be ordinary.

I’ve built this space with Copilot to share what I’ve learned — not as gospel, but as groundwork. You’re invited to follow, replicate, challenge, and improve what’s here.

“Explore the machinery behind civic truth. Built with Copilot, curated for clarity.”

📚 About This Site

The Civic Intelligence Centre

Welcome to a hub built for facts, frameworks, and public trust.

This isn’t a platform for personality. It’s a procedural engine for civic inquiry — where evidence lives in structured form, and investigations are shared for replication, not just reaction.

Our Purpose

We exist to strengthen civic oversight through reproducible research, legally-grounded documentation, and transparency-first tooling. Whether you’re an investigator, journalist, policymaker, or concerned citizen, this site equips you with:

FOI templates and submissions
Timelines of key events
Entity tracing and directorship maps
Regulatory complaints and safeguarding analysis
AI-assisted drafting tools powered by Copilot

Our Method

We don’t speculate. Every finding is sourced, every complaint procedurally aligned, and every bundle designed to withstand scrutiny. Our work reflects a commitment to safeguarding frameworks, ethical governance, and public accountability.

If you spot an error or omission, we welcome correction — because integrity strengthens this Centre, not weakens it.

🤝 Why You Can Trust Us

Complaints submitted to regulators, councils, and police forces
FOI responses received and documented
Investigations echoed in peer platforms like JAOC
Our silence from institutions signals a respect for procedural rigor, not dismissal

We stand beside others who seek truth. But our distinction lies in method — not just message.

Add comment

Comments

Deborah Hazel

4 days ago

It made me cry, the wording puts you in the story and I couldn't help but feel your pain, Wow what an amazing man you are.
This website I been trying to access for while, I am speechless right know, so much knowledge in here.
Thank you 💜

ANGELINA TASEV

15 days ago

Shocking

LaRon Ravon McClellan

The State of Nevada and the State of Georgia has failed to protect life – which, under the constitution of the United States requires an investigation into the lives of Nevada residents (United States Citizens): LaRon Ravon McClellan Sr., Latrice Nichelle Williams, LaRon Ravon McClellan Jr., and Amira Dorothy McClellan, the law additionally requires an investigation into the lives of Georgia State residents (United States Citizens), Lomando Ramon Moses, Kristen Moses, Sevin Ramon Moses and Jarrell Moses via an inquest. Our government must take positive steps to protect lives – the lives of everyone, as this requires law enforcement to take reasonable steps to protect a person’s life, if they know, have been informed, have been made aware or ought to know that the individual(s) or person may be facing real or immediate harm or risk.

Article I, Section 9 ensures that government cannot lawlessly detain individuals without judicial oversight. I contend that the aforementioned lives are being held against their free will by law enforcement agents/government. Article I, Section 9 and 10 prohibit bills of attainder and ex post facto laws. Thus, law enforcement (of any kind), that is, the government cannot target and punish specific individual or groups without judicial trial. I contend the illegal utilization of a current targeting program (correlated to or in parallel with the known operation of MK-ULTRA/COINTELPRO). I contend that this illegal targeting operation/program is currently being utilized on myself, Armetha McClellan (considered a whistleblower, initiated in and derivative of a 2014 legal matter, including but not limited to the current utilization of MK-ULTRA and COINTELPRO). This targeting operation/program includes myself and my entire family, friends, co-workers, peers, and others.

The Bill of Rights (ratified in 1791) – The First Amendment, prohibits any impediment of an individual’s rights to exercise freedom of speech, and the press, which ensures that citizens can express their opinions without fear of government repression [harm and retaliation]. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizures. It requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause, thereby ensuring that citizens maintain their privacy and such privacy is respected, thus preventing intrusions by the government. I contend that while exercising my constitutional rights, derivative of the 2014 civil suit (McClellan V. Lincoln Harris, 2014), I became a target for detestation and retaliation. As such, my personal and private property have been illegally searched on multiple occasions, my personal and private property have been invaded and infringed upon – directly by law enforcement and/or under the directive of law enforcement/government.
The Fifth Amendment provides several critical protections, including the Due Process Clause, which guarantees fair procedures. The aforementioned reflects a profound commitment to preserve individual liberties and limits government power. As this echo’s a democracy, this denotes the true significance and fundamental rights of a democracy. The Thirteenth Amendment, ratified in 1865, abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. The language of this amendment unequivocally ended the institution of slavery that had marred the nation since its inception. By making slavery unconstitutional, the Thirteenth Amendment was a legal triumph, affirming the nation's commitment to human dignity and liberty. The amendment's Due Process Clause prohibits states from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property without due process of law," extending protections previously applicable only at the federal level to the states. This clause has been instrumental in ensuring that states uphold basic legal rights, providing a check against state governments that might otherwise infringe upon individual liberties. I contend that my basic legal rights, human and constitutional rights and that of my entire families’ rights have been and currently are being infringed upon, egregiously violated. The Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction. This clause has served as the bedrock for numerous landmark Supreme Court decisions combating racial discrimination, inequality, and segregation. Over time, it has been interpreted to protect a broad array of rights, ensuring that no group is unjustly targeted or marginalized by state laws. These amendments reflect the steadfast commitment of the American people to uphold the principles enshrined in this revered document, ensuring that all citizens enjoy the fundamental rights and liberties that define the nation. Today, most individual rights that protect citizens against federal infringement are also shielded from state violation due to the selective incorporation doctrine. The Fourteenth Amendment acts as

Show more comments