KEIR STARMER *New Information*

Israel own 

Keir Starmer

 

 

The documentary and whistleblowing that Keir Starmer and the Labour Party prefer to keep hidden from public view.

 

In March 2018, Starmer told the BBC’s Nick Robinson that his father Rodney "was a toolmaker working in a factory and working every hour, basically." The following year, he told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme that his father "worked in a factory" as a toolmaker. The inference that listeners might have drawn is that Rodney Starmer was employed by somebody else. For reasons best known to himself, Keir Starmer did not use any of these opportunities to explain that his father, in fact, ran his own business, the Oxted Tool Company, as a sole trader. Reflecting on his son’s knighthood in 2014, Rodney Starmer wrote in Oxted’s theatre newsletter that his son had spent six months before university working "in my factory operating a production machine." Perhaps it would be most accurate to say that Starmer’s background was neither working class nor 'posh', as some commentators have attempted to prove, but was instead closer to what sociologists would once have called petit bourgeois. This French term is akin to lower-middle class.

Keir Starmer keeps on mentioning his dad (Rodney) was a toolmaker but never mentions that his grandfather (Herbert) was a Tory who lived in Marden Castle or that his great-uncle was Chairman of the Godstone Conservative Association.On 27 May 2024, The Telegraph reported that Keir Starmer comes from a line of gamekeepers, according to a 1977 pamphlet written by his grandfather Herbert for the Bourne Society:

 

Mishcon de Reya job

 

In June 2014, Starmer joined the law firm Mishcon de Reya The company has received huge fines for facilitating money laundering, and frequently helps wealthy individuals and powerful corporations abuse the British legal system to "intimidate and destroy" journalists. Starmer was forced in July 2017 by then-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to depart his well-remunerated position there, after taking a Shadow Cabinet role. Starmer received over £6,000 for just 24 hours of work at Mishcon de Reya in 2016.

During the infamous so-called “Chicken Coup”, less than a year after the Labour membership had handed Jeremy Corbyn a massive mandate to lead the party, numerous Labour Shadow Cabinet Ministers instigated co-ordinated resignations from the front bench in a deeply cynical attempt to remove him as leader.

In his resignation letter dated 27 June 2016, Keir Starmer – who was a Shadow Immigration Minister at the time – essentially claimed that because a lot of other Shadow Ministers had resigned, he decided to resign too. In the opening paragraph of Starmer’s letter, he claims that he initially “respected the mandate” that Labour members had given to Jeremy Corbyn to lead the party.

Starmer then uses two different excuses for his decision to disregard the democratic will of Labour members: claiming that the party needed a “louder voice” regarding Brexit, and that Mr Corbyn’s position was “untenable” because so many Shadow Ministers had resigned.

In the subsequent 2016 Labour leadership election, Starmer went on to support the astonishingly dour, former big pharma lobbyist, Owen Smith.

During the 2016 "Chicken Coup", the right thing to do would have clearly been to trust the decision of Labour members, rather than an overwhelmingly right-wing and detached Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP), and support the democratically elected leader of the party. Had the PLP been united, Labour may well have been in a position to gain the few thousands extra votes necessary to have formed a government in the UK/2017 General Election campaign.

Unfortunately, Starmer’s willingness to disregard clear democratic decisions in favour of what he thinks is right is not an isolated incident, with the Shadow Brexit Secretary becoming the architect of Labour’s decision to change their Brexit policy from respecting the result in 2017 to supporting a second referendum in 2019 – a policy regarded as the main reason that the party lost huge numbers of seats in their pro-Leave heartlands to the Tories in December’s General Election.

Whilst Labour may still have lost the election had they continued with their 2017 Brexit policy to respect the Brexit vote, they would unquestionably have been far closer to the Conservative Party in terms of votes – with the only genuine question being whether the Lib Dems would have been able to charge through the middle on their pro-Remain platform.

Moreover, at the UK/2019 General Election, the right thing to do – electorally speaking – would have been to continue to support the democratic decision of the British people regarding the Brexit vote. Labour’s decision to support a second referendum is clearly not the only reason for their loss, but it was certainly a huge factor in the sheer scale of it – and Starmer was crucial in pushing the party towards it.[33]

After the October 7 attacks in 2023 which began a new Israel–Hamas war, Starmer expressed support for Israel, condemned Hamas terrorism, and said, "This action by Hamas does nothing for Palestinians. And Israel must always have the right to defend her people."[34] He also said “Israel has the right” to withhold power and water from Palestinian civilians. "Obviously, everything should be done within international law."[35]

 

Former Israel spy on his social media team

Sir Keir hired a former Israel spy to work in his social media team. Assaf Kaplan was hired as a "social media listener", and worked for the infamous 8200 cyber unit of the Israeli intelligence services. Although Israeli citizens are subject to mandatory conscription into the Israeli army, the duration of national service is only two and a half years. Kaplan served in Israeli intelligence for nearly five years, twice the normal conscription period

 

COVID-19

Starmer has been a weak leader in opposing government policies during COVID-19. The sole criticism of Boris Johnson throughout has been; not enough lockdownsvaccinesmask mandates etc. In December 2021, Sir Keir insisted that, while he is not "comfortable" with the idea of vaccine passports, he believes they are necessary.[37]

On 21 July, he self-isolated for the fourth time.

 

 

Preferring globalism over national politics

In January 2023, Starmer admitted he prefers hobnobbing with the billionaires and their select invitees in the World Economic Forum in Davos to national politics in London. Asked to choose between Davos and Westminster, he said: "Davos... Because Westminster is too constrained. And, you know, it's closed and we're not having meaning....Once you get out of Westminster, whether it's Davos or anywhere else, you actually engage with people that you can see [yourself] working with in the future." On the seat of British democracy, Sir Keir added: "Westminster is just a tribal shouting place.

 

Venality

 

Keir Starmer has personally accepted just under £43,000 in personal gratuities,[40] like football tickets, holidays, staying at luxury hotels, getting tickets to go watch the races. This is more money accepted in gratuities than any Labour leader since records began in 1997. By comparison Jeremy Corbyn during his entire time as Labour leader accepted a single corporate gratuity tickets to Glastonbury where he spoke.

Starmer took £3,000 worth of tickets to go watch the races from the Arena Racing Company, which runs all of the horse tracks in the UK. In that role it is one of the biggest players in the entire UK gambling industry. He accepted football tickets from a the construction company Mulalley & Co, which received a large fined for installing defective cladding on five tower blocks that put the residents of those tower blocks at a serious fire safety. Other "gifts" include a meal for himself and an aide worth £380, as a gift from Google while he was in Davos at the World Economic Forum, and luxury hotel stays from billionaire Matthew Moulding.

In 2024, it was exposed that he accepted £16,000 for clothing and £2,485 for multiple pairs of glasses from Lord Alli. Starmer had also used Lord Alli’s Covent Garden penthouse, worth £18 million, which he stayed in with his family for a month and a half during the campaign

 

Questions Keir Starmer must answer from his DPP employment

 

1. Why did you meet the head of MI5, the domestic security service, for informal social drinks in April 2013, the year after you decided not to prosecute MI5 for its role in torture?

2. When and why did you join the Trilateral Commission and what does your membership of this intelligence-linked network entail?

3. What did you discuss with then US Attorney General Eric Holder when you met him on 9 November 2011 in Washington DC, at a time you were handling the Julian Assange case as the public prosecutor?

4. What role did you play in the Crown Prosecution Service’s irregular handling of the Julian Assange case during your period as DPP?

5. Why did you develop such a close relationship with the Times newspaper while you were the DPP and does this relationship still exist?

 

In February 2022, during a parliamentary joust, disgraced former Prime Minister Boris Johnson accused Starmer of having spent his time as CPS chief “prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile.” The broadside ignited a public firestorm, with British politicians of all parties and the entire mainstream media lining up to condemn the premier’s comments as a repulsive libel. A senior Downing Street staffer resigned in disgust. The pressure grew so severe, Johnson retracted his comments in a matter of three days.

However, the fact remained that Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions when British authorities possessed persuasive evidence of Savile’s heinous sexual crimes over many years, and he inexplicably refused to move against the paedophile. Sources within the CPS have claimed that he had no knowledge of the decision to drop the case. It is also commonly alleged that a formal inquiry he ordered in 2012 into the failure to prosecute Savile condemned investigating police, not the CPS.

As the inquiry report’s contents make clear, this characterisation is completely false. Officers who interviewed Savile’s victims in 2007/8 were indeed slammed for not providing them with more information – namely, that others had independently come forward, telling disturbingly similar stories. The report concluded their testimony should’ve been acted upon, as “there was nothing to suggest that the alleged victims had colluded in their accounts, nor that they were in any way [unreliable].”

Despite this, “police treated them and the accounts they gave with a degree of caution which was neither justified nor required.” It is nonetheless clear officers shut down the investigation under express CPS direction. The Service’s designated “reviewing lawyer” on the allegations – an “extremely experienced ‘rape specialist’” – told police “at an early stage” he “would not be inclined to prosecute these cases because they were ‘relatively minor’,” and due to the time that had elapsed since the offenses were allegedly committed.

The CPS lawyer’s “relatively minor” appraisal of Savile’s heinous crimes “troubled” the inquiry investigator. “I would hope that any prosecutor would regard a sexual assault as being in and of itself serious,” they wrote. “These particular assaults were far from trivial: they represented a course of conduct against vulnerable women and girls by a man who was in effect in a position of trust.” As a result, the investigator had “reservations about the way in which the prosecutor reached his decision”:

“The allegations made were both serious and credible; the prosecutor should have recognised this and sought to ‘build’ a prosecution. In particular, there were aspects of what he was told by the police…which should have caused him to ask further questions…I have been driven to conclude that had the police and prosecutors [emphasis added] taken a different approach a prosecution might have been possible.”

Events Participated In

 

Description

Munich Security Conference/2024

16 February 2024 -18 February 2024

Germany - Munich - Bavaria

 

Annual conference of mid-level functionaries from the military-industrial complex - politicians, propagandists and lobbyists - in their own bubble, far from the concerns of their subjects

 

 

UK/Parliament/Voted YES to vaccine passports in 2021

UK/House of Commons

 

These members of the UK Parliament voted YES to the introduction of a "vaccine" passport in 2021

 

WEF/Annual Meeting/2023

16 January 202320 -January 2023

World Economic Forum = Switzerland

 

The theme of the meeting was "Cooperation in a Fragmented World"

 

Starmer Pdf
PDF – 830.7 KB 647 downloads
7 Pdf
PDF – 138.3 KB 931 downloads