Tackling the Issue at Source
Starmer has emphasized the importance of addressing the root causes of migration. He announced £84 million in funding for health, education, and humanitarian projects in African and Middle Eastern countries. This funding aims to improve conditions in these regions, thereby reducing the need for people to flee their homes12.
International Cooperation
Starmer has stressed the need for deeper cooperation with European partners. He has proposed increasing the UK’s presence at Europol and establishing new cooperation arrangements with countries like Slovenia and Slovakia to tackle organized crime and people smuggling
Border Security Bill
Starmer’s government has introduced a new Border Security Bill, which focuses on counter-terrorism and increased surveillance to manage migration more effectively.
The Hungarian plan led by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.
Strict Immigration Policies
- Border Security: Hungary has implemented stringent border controls, including the construction of a border fence with Serbia. The government has declared a state of crisis due to mass migration and considers illegal border crossing a crime1.
- Detention of Migrants: Migrants entering Hungary illegally are often detained in government camps until their asylum status is resolved. This policy aims to prevent them from traveling freely within Europe2.
Legislation
- Stop Soros Law: In 2018, Hungary passed the “Stop Soros” law, which criminalizes aiding illegal immigrants. This law targets individuals and organizations that help migrants apply for asylum, with penalties including imprisonment34.
- Defiance of EU Rulings: Despite the European Union’s top court ruling that Hungary’s immigration laws breach EU law, the Hungarian government has vowed to maintain its policies. Orbán has argued that the EU’s migrant rules are obsolete and that Hungary must protect its borders3.
Orbán’s government remains committed to its strict immigration policies, despite ongoing legal and ethical debates.
The UK has recently introduced new police powers that impact freedom of speech and the right to demonstrate, primarily through the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022.
Protest Restrictions
- Noise Limits: Police can impose noise limits on protests. If a protest is deemed too noisy and likely to cause serious disruption or distress, it can be restricted1.
- Start and End Times: Authorities can set specific start and end times for protests1.
- Single-Person Protests: The new powers also apply to protests involving just one person. This means even a single individual holding a placard can be subject to these restrictions1.
Public Nuisance
- New Offence: The Act introduces the offence of “intentionally or recklessly causing public nuisance.” This is aimed at preventing tactics like occupying public spaces or hanging off bridges1.
Penalties
- Fines and Imprisonment: Failing to comply with these restrictions can result in fines of up to £2,500. Additionally, causing damage to memorials can lead to up to 10 years in prison1.
Human Rights Concerns
Liberty, a prominent civil liberties organization in the UK, is actively engaged in several initiatives to combat government policies that they believe infringe on human rights and freedoms. Here are some of their key actions:
Legal Challenges
- Surveillance and Privacy: Liberty has been involved in legal actions against the government and security services, particularly concerning unlawful surveillance. They have challenged the “Snoopers’ Charter” (Investigatory Powers Act) and have taken MI5 and the Home Office to court over unlawful surveillance warrants1.
- Protest Rights: Liberty has successfully challenged regulations that lowered the threshold for police intervention in protests. The High Court ruled that these regulations were unlawful, marking a significant victory for the organization2.
Campaigns and Advocacy
- Defending Protest Rights: Liberty campaigns to protect the right to protest, which they see as fundamental to democracy. They have launched petitions and public awareness campaigns to oppose restrictive measures on demonstrations3.
- Policy Influence: Liberty works to influence government policy to ensure that laws and practices respect human rights. They engage with policymakers, provide expert analysis, and advocate for changes that protect marginalized communities3.
Public Engagement
- Raising Awareness: Liberty conducts public education campaigns to inform people about their rights and how to defend them. They encourage public participation in their campaigns and provide resources for individuals to take action3.
- Support and Advice: The organization offers legal advice and support to individuals whose rights have been violated. They aim to empower people to stand up against injustice and hold authorities accountable3.
Liberty’s efforts are focused on ensuring that everyone in the UK is treated fairly and that their fundamental rights are protected.
Keir Starmer the UK Prime Minister
He was mentioned in the files of the Czechoslovakian secret police (StB) due to his participation in a work camp in 1986.
The StB monitored the camp and collected information on participants, including Starmer, but there is no evidence that he was aware of this surveillance or that he had any involvement with the secret service12.
Keir Starmer’s tenure as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) from 2008 to 2013 has been scrutinized, and several decisions made during his time have been criticized. Here are some notable points:
Jimmy Savile Case
- Non-Prosecution: One of the most high-profile criticisms is related to the decision not to prosecute Jimmy Savile in 2009. Although Starmer was the head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) at the time, he was not the reviewing lawyer for the case. An investigation later criticized both the CPS and the police for their handling of the allegations1.
Ian Tomlinson Case
- Initial Decision: The CPS initially decided not to charge police officer Simon Harwood for the death of newspaper vendor Ian Tomlinson during the 2009 G20 protests. This decision was based on a pathologist’s report that Tomlinson died of natural causes. However, after an inquest ruled the death as unlawful killing, the CPS reversed its decision, and Harwood was eventually acquitted2.
Post Office Horizon Scandal
- Potential Mistakes: Starmer has acknowledged that the CPS under his leadership could have made mistakes in the Post Office Horizon scandal, where sub-postmasters were wrongfully prosecuted for theft and fraud due to faulty IT systems3.
Tax-Free Pension Scheme
- Controversy: Starmer received a special “tax unregistered” pension scheme when he stood down as DPP in 2013. This has been criticized, especially in light of his later criticisms of similar measures in government budgets4.
Do you believe that Starmer is capable of fulfilling the country's needs in addressing illegal migration and ensuring that our citizens can live in peace and harmony? His history before assuming leadership is marked by numerous errors, and some might argue it reflects a tendency towards corruption and self-interest for financial gain. During his time in Jeremy Corbyn's cabinet, he was involved with the Trilateral Commission, an organization that would likely not have received support from traditional Labour Party members. He concealed this affiliation from Jeremy, and it is evident that he intentionally undermined him.
The document I have produced gives you clear facts that you can use to simplify the information around immigration and the crisis we are in. I am at present collating information on who these illegal migrants really are and the governments plan and agenda. Please keep checking the website for further information or be first to hear the news on my newsletter.
“When a man is denied the right to live the life he believes in, he has no choice but to become an outlaw.”
Nelson Mandela
UNITED NATIONS IMMIGRATION AGENDA
Countries have implemented diverse responses to the recommendations outlined in the Replacement Migration report.
The following was the original intention:
1. Tailored Immigration Policies: Certain countries have adopted customized immigration policies that target particular skills or address labor shortages.
2. Integration Initiatives: Various nations have initiated programs to help migrants integrate into their new communities, including language courses, cultural sensitivity training, and job assistance.
3. Public Attitudes: Policy decisions have been influenced by public sentiment, leading some countries to become more receptive to migrants while others have tightened their immigration regulations.
4. Enhanced Data Collection: Improved data gathering has enabled better monitoring of migration trends, facilitating informed policy adjustments.
In conclusion, the responses have been shaped by individual countries' unique circumstances, political environments, and economic requirements.5. 5. Bilateral Agreements: Some countries have entered into bilateral agreements with other nations to facilitate the movement of migrants, ensuring a smoother transition and integration process.
6. Refugee Resettlement Programs: In response to the global refugee crisis, certain countries have implemented programs to resettle refugees, providing them with a safe haven and opportunities for a better future.
7. Humanitarian Aid: Countries have also responded to the humanitarian aspect of migration by providing aid and support to migrants in need, both within their borders and in regions experiencing conflict or natural disasters.
8. Anti-Discrimination Measures: To combat xenophobia and discrimination, some countries have implemented measures to promote tolerance and inclusivity, ensuring that migrants are treated fairly and with respect.
9. Economic Development Initiatives: Some countries have leveraged migration as a tool for economic development, attracting skilled workers and entrepreneurs to contribute to their workforce and stimulate growth.
10. Global Cooperation: Recognizing the interconnected nature of migration, countries have engaged in international cooperation and dialogue to address common challenges and find sustainable solutions for managing migration effectively.
The reality presents a different scenario, with illegal migration increasing and the government's ineffective attempts at deceiving the public appearing like a comical show. It is evident, in my view, that they are pursuing this agenda with no other rational explanation. Immediate action is necessary to prevent further chaos and regain control of our country. Voting for any party, including reform, will not make any significant difference.